| From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| To: | vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev) |
| Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, frankpit(at)pop(dot)dn(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6) |
| Date: | 1999-06-10 08:44:38 |
| Message-ID: | m10s0Ry-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Actually, I just don't think that breaks in loops are always better
> than gotos.
>
> > Vadim is surely one of the real programmers in our project.
> > It's not only that he isn't afraid using GOTO's. He also
>
> Like someone didn't afraid to use siglongjmp in elog.c.
There are much better ones in the PL handlers! memcpy()'s
mangling sigjmp_buf's between sigsetjmp() siglongjmp() stuff.
>
> > know's very well how to speed things up by complicating the
> > code :-)
>
> -:)
>
> VAdim
>
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Kalchev | 1999-06-10 09:05:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem |
| Previous Message | Pedro J. Lobo | 1999-06-10 07:47:27 | Postgres dies in the rules regression test (64-bit problem) |