Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: frankpit(at)pop(dot)dn(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)
Date: 1999-06-10 13:54:13
Message-ID: 375FC385.89F5B5CF@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > Actually, I just don't think that breaks in loops are always better
> > than gotos.
> >
> > > Vadim is surely one of the real programmers in our project.
> > > It's not only that he isn't afraid using GOTO's. He also
> >
> > Like someone didn't afraid to use siglongjmp in elog.c.
>
> There are much better ones in the PL handlers! memcpy()'s
> mangling sigjmp_buf's between sigsetjmp() siglongjmp() stuff.

Wow! Voodoo!
I very like such things -:)
This is really the way what Real Programmers follow -:)

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Kalchev 1999-06-10 14:17:25 another locale problem
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-06-10 13:33:21 Re: [HACKERS] transaction rollbacks on error