| From: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) |
|---|---|
| To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
| Cc: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart), Joel_Neu/alydaar/US(at)alydaar(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k |
| Date: | 1998-10-22 20:10:06 |
| Message-ID: | m0zWR3e-0000emC@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> I have added a mention to the FAQ on the web site, saying the we are Y2K
> compliant.
Er, is that such a good idea? I might stick my neck out if I am being paid
for it but I don't know that I would want lawyers arguing over exactly
what constitutes "Y2K compliant." Sure, we are but that won't stop
ambulance ch^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers from causing us grief.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dragana Obradovic | 1998-10-22 20:12:38 | |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-10-22 19:33:34 | Bug? relpages, reltuples resets to zero |