Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Joel_Neu/alydaar/US(at)alydaar(dot)com, (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart) <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, (Bruce Momjian) <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Date: 1998-10-22 20:21:18
Message-ID: XFMail.981022162118.vev@michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 22-Oct-98 D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> Thus spake Bruce Momjian
>> I have added a mention to the FAQ on the web site, saying the we are Y2K
>> compliant.
>
>
> Er, is that such a good idea? I might stick my neck out if I am being paid
> for it but I don't know that I would want lawyers arguing over exactly
> what constitutes "Y2K compliant." Sure, we are but that won't stop
> ambulance ch^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers from causing us grief.

But doesn't that depend entirely on what the meaning of "is" is? :)

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Searchable Campground Listings http://www.camping-usa.com
"There is no outfit less entitled to lecture me about bloat
than the federal government" -- Tony Snow
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-22 21:10:47 Re: [HACKERS] Bug? relpages, reltuples resets to zero
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-22 20:14:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k