Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, Joel_Neu/alydaar/US(at)alydaar(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Date: 1998-10-22 20:14:44
Message-ID: 199810222014.QAA03563@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> > I have added a mention to the FAQ on the web site, saying the we are Y2K
> > compliant.
>
>
> Er, is that such a good idea? I might stick my neck out if I am being paid
> for it but I don't know that I would want lawyers arguing over exactly
> what constitutes "Y2K compliant." Sure, we are but that won't stop
> ambulance ch^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers from causing us grief.

Our software is supplied as-is. Period.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1998-10-22 20:21:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Previous Message Dragana Obradovic 1998-10-22 20:12:38