PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server

From: Thomas Løcke <thomas(dot)granvej6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Date: 2010-05-01 18:47:38
Message-ID: h2z1f0fa7ae1005011147gd08e9b4ei420d0301c6e40d45@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Anybody know of any recent comparisons made between the two?

I'm in the process of buying a new telephony related software suite,
and I'm getting mixed advice. Some say that MSSQL is _much_
better/faster than PostgreSQL, and others say the opposite.

The vendor is more or less indifferent, with a small plus to the
Microsoft solution because, well, they are a Microsoft shop. The
sales-people all bang on about MSSQL being the superior choice, and
PostgreSQL being a "toy compared to the Microsoft RDBMS". The tech
people though are divided into three groups: One group says the two
systems are more or less equal, another group who says the Microsoft
database is superior and finally a group who speaks highly of
PostgreSQL.

I've not been able to convince them to send me some actual benchmark
numbers, which actually should turn on quite a few alarms, come to
think about it. :o)

Maybe you guys are aware of some recent generic tests/comparisons
between the two systems?

Regards,
Thomas

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-05-01 18:50:43 Re: Avoiding surrogate keys
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-05-01 16:16:03 Re: Native DB replication for PG