Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: Thomas Løcke <thomas(dot)granvej6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Date: 2010-05-01 20:23:38
Message-ID: 4BDC8DCA.9040301@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thomas Løcke wrote:
> Anybody know of any recent comparisons made between the two?
>

for purely SQL, I prefer Postgres by a wide margin. But, MS SQL
Server comes with a whole infrastructure that includes a lot of powerful
tools, like replication, data extraction and translation, active
directory integrated single sign-on, and so forth. If you're working
in a pure MS world, with .NOT -er- .NET, etc etc, its pretty hard to
get away from MS SQL as there are so many tools

the bottom line tends to be driven by whatever the applications
support. I have one MS SQL database in my lab hosting a program which
only supports MS SQL. Luckily, the demands on this database are low
enough that i can use the free SQL Express.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Filip Rembiałkowski 2010-05-01 20:25:35 Re: Indexing queries with bit masks
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2010-05-01 20:19:00 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server