From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Løcke <thomas(dot)granvej6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server |
Date: | 2010-05-01 20:23:38 |
Message-ID: | 4BDC8DCA.9040301@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thomas Løcke wrote:
> Anybody know of any recent comparisons made between the two?
>
for purely SQL, I prefer Postgres by a wide margin. But, MS SQL
Server comes with a whole infrastructure that includes a lot of powerful
tools, like replication, data extraction and translation, active
directory integrated single sign-on, and so forth. If you're working
in a pure MS world, with .NOT -er- .NET, etc etc, its pretty hard to
get away from MS SQL as there are so many tools
the bottom line tends to be driven by whatever the applications
support. I have one MS SQL database in my lab hosting a program which
only supports MS SQL. Luckily, the demands on this database are low
enough that i can use the free SQL Express.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Filip Rembiałkowski | 2010-05-01 20:25:35 | Re: Indexing queries with bit masks |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-05-01 20:19:00 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server |