| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Koen De Groote <kdg(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization |
| Date: | 2024-10-25 07:32:49 |
| Message-ID: | fac19453ba2df53a5efebf1a934baf49ff91a48a.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 17:22 +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> It seems to me the same clarification could be achieved just by adding
> 1 word ("PostgreSQL") to the original text. e.g.
>
> BEFORE
> Logical replication of a table typically starts with taking a snapshot
> of the data on the publisher database and copying that to the
> subscriber.
>
> AFTER #1 (I added "PostgreSQL")
> Logical replication of a table typically starts with PostgreSQL taking
> a snapshot of the data on the publisher database and copying that to
> the subscriber.
+1 on this version. Either this way or the way I suggested, it doesn't
matter as far as I am concerned.
Perhaps Koen wants to chime in and say what sounds best to him.
> Or, AFTER #2 (I added "PostgreSQL internally")
> Logical replication of a table typically starts with PostgreSQL
> internally taking a snapshot of the data on the publisher database and
> copying that to the subscriber.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-10-25 14:39:08 | Re: Documentation mistake? |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-10-25 06:22:53 | Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization |