Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization

Number 2 would be perfect, I think. It leaves no doubt at all.

Regards,
Koen De Groote

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 9:32 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
wrote:

> On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 17:22 +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > It seems to me the same clarification could be achieved just by adding
> > 1 word ("PostgreSQL") to the original text. e.g.
> >
> > BEFORE
> > Logical replication of a table typically starts with taking a snapshot
> > of the data on the publisher database and copying that to the
> > subscriber.
> >
> > AFTER #1 (I added "PostgreSQL")
> > Logical replication of a table typically starts with PostgreSQL taking
> > a snapshot of the data on the publisher database and copying that to
> > the subscriber.
>
> +1 on this version. Either this way or the way I suggested, it doesn't
> matter as far as I am concerned.
>
> Perhaps Koen wants to chime in and say what sounds best to him.
>
> > Or, AFTER #2 (I added "PostgreSQL internally")
> > Logical replication of a table typically starts with PostgreSQL
> > internally taking a snapshot of the data on the publisher database and
> > copying that to the subscriber.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>