| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "fed(dot)guman(at)gmail(dot)com" <fed(dot)guman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation mistake? |
| Date: | 2024-10-25 14:39:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYwBNTXOBE5aXzvdXhunYztW+rJc+d38CAXhh+P5v25ew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thursday, October 24, 2024, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/indexes-bitmap-scans.html
> Description:
>
> In page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/indexes-bitmap-scans.html
> написано следующее:
> "Another example is that if we have separate indexes on x and y, one
> possible implementation of a query like WHERE x = 5 AND y = 6 is to use
> each
> index with the appropriate query clause and then AND together the index
> results to identify the result rows".
>
>
This is a correct and intended sentence. The paragraph for bitmap covers
both OR from the earlier example and AND from this example.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-10-25 14:44:56 | Re: Documentation mistake? |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-10-25 07:32:49 | Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization |