Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2024-08-02 18:48:40
Message-ID: fa1c769b-42aa-46c2-ba0c-aa21f3eeb0a1@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02.08.24 19:51, Jacob Champion wrote:
> But it sounds like we agree that we shouldn't be using fe_memutils at
> all in shlib builds. (If you can't use palloc -- it calls exit -- then
> you can't use pfree either.) Is 0002 still worth pursuing, once I've
> correctly wordsmithed the commit? Or did I misunderstand your point?

Yes, I think with an adjusted comment and commit message, the actual
change makes sense.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-08-02 19:00:52 Re: New compiler warnings in buildfarm
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-08-02 18:45:20 Re: Official devcontainer config