| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Date: | 2024-04-03 19:48:31 |
| Message-ID: | f0592e65-7433-4d48-bf75-34eb5ac7dd21@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-04-03 We 15:12, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The
> fact that very few animals run the ssl tests is a pet peeve of mine, it would
> be nice if we could get broader coverage there.
>
Well, the only reason for that is that the SSL tests need to be listed
in PG_TEST_EXTRA, and the only reason for that is that there's a
possible hazard on multi-user servers. But I bet precious few buildfarm
animals run in such an environment. Mine don't - I'm the only user.
Maybe we could send out an email to the buildfarm-owners list asking
people to consider allowing the ssl tests.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-03 19:49:09 | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-04-03 19:42:36 | Re: Security lessons from liblzma |