| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Date: | 2024-04-03 22:26:17 |
| Message-ID: | 306AE3F1-C922-40A6-9960-BD726CD4EE3F@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 3 Apr 2024, at 21:48, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On 2024-04-03 We 15:12, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> The
>> fact that very few animals run the ssl tests is a pet peeve of mine, it would
>> be nice if we could get broader coverage there.
>
> Well, the only reason for that is that the SSL tests need to be listed in PG_TEST_EXTRA, and the only reason for that is that there's a possible hazard on multi-user servers. But I bet precious few buildfarm animals run in such an environment. Mine don't - I'm the only user.
>
> Maybe we could send out an email to the buildfarm-owners list asking people to consider allowing the ssl tests.
I think that sounds like a good idea.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-04-03 22:27:27 | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-04-03 22:16:03 | Re: Security lessons from liblzma - libsystemd |