From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
Date: | 2024-04-03 22:27:27 |
Message-ID: | 2EEB2314-2DA8-489E-B10B-ADADAC2BF000@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 4 Apr 2024, at 00:06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 3 Apr 2024, at 19:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Bottom line for me is that pulling 1.0.1 support now is OK,
>>> but I think pulling 1.0.2 is premature.
>
>> Is Red Hat building and and shipping v17 packages for RHEL7 ELS customers? If
>> not then it seems mostly academical to tie our dependencies to RHEL ELS unless
>> I'm missing something.
>
> True, they won't be doing that, and neither will Devrim. So maybe
> we can leave RHEL7 out of the discussion, in which case there's
> not a lot of reason to keep 1.0.2 support. We'll need to notify
> buildfarm owners to adjust their configurations.
The patch will also need to be adjusted to work with LibreSSL, but I know Jacob
was looking into that so ideally we should have something to review before
the weekend.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-04-03 22:50:29 | Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512 |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-04-03 22:26:17 | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |