Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Alexandra Wang <alexandra(dot)wang(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support
Date: 2024-09-27 11:07:51
Message-ID: eb8741fe-89c4-438e-b6f7-b7eb501cd25c@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2024-09-27 Fr 5:49 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2024, at 16:45, Alexandra Wang <alexandra(dot)wang(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I didn’t run pgindent earlier, so here’s the updated version with the
>> correct indentation. Hope this helps!
> Oh, nice! I don’t suppose the standard also has defined an operator equivalent to ->>, though, has it? I tend to want the text output far more often than a JSON scalar.
>

That would defeat being able to chain these.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shlok Kyal 2024-09-27 11:24:46 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Previous Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2024-09-27 10:44:25 Re: Add has_large_object_privilege function