Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alexandra Wang <alexandra(dot)wang(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support
Date: 2024-09-27 21:19:15
Message-ID: CC7B8EC8-2992-49D1-B245-DC6ADCFF8282@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep 27, 2024, at 12:07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> That would defeat being able to chain these.

Not if it’s a different operator. But I’m fine to just keep using ->> at the end of a chain.

D

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-09-27 21:24:50 Re: MAINTAIN privilege -- what do we need to un-revert it?
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2024-09-27 20:45:45 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER