| From: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add has_large_object_privilege function |
| Date: | 2024-09-27 10:44:25 |
| Message-ID: | 87a5ftbcl2.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> - New functions introduced during a development cycle should use OIDs in
> the range 8000-9999. See 98eab30b93d5, consisting of running
> ./unused_oids to get a random range.
There's been seen several fixups of this kind recently. Should we add a
note about this to the comment at the top of all of the pg_*.dat files
that have explicit oid assignments? People might be more likely to
notice that than the the section over in bki.sgml.
- ilmari
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2024-09-27 11:07:51 | Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support |
| Previous Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-09-27 10:36:58 | Re: Truncate logs by max_log_size |