pg_repack vs. running logical/physical replication

From: Dirk Krautschick <dirk(dot)krautschick(at)googlemail(dot)com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_repack vs. running logical/physical replication
Date: 2024-01-29 14:56:13
Message-ID: e8a8d645-3ac2-4673-a484-96c0dfb47bea@googlemail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi,

is there any good reason to cut of logical and/or physical replication
for the time pg_repack (please no discussion about pg_repack at all,
customer request, his idea, his strict wish) is running? I am not so
deep into how pg_repack is running things but as the docs are saying it
could affect hard at least the publications for logrep. Haven't tested
it yet and just hopeing for a quick answer here :-)

Thanks and best regards

Dirk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2024-01-29 19:27:05 Re: pg_repack vs. running logical/physical replication
Previous Message kaido vaikla 2024-01-29 09:03:37 Re: pg_dumpall and owner of the extension