From: | "Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best |
Date: | 2007-09-11 16:26:51 |
Message-ID: | e373d31e0709110926i371bf45fuf132210255e138c2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks Greg.
> You're not going to get a particularly useful answer here without giving
> some specifics about the two disk controllers you're comparing, how much
> cache they have, and whether they include a battery backup.
>
Scenario 1, SATAII:
- Server: Asus RS120-E4/PA4 Dedicated Server
- CPU: Single -- Intel Quad Core Xeon Processor x3210 Processor 2.13Ghz
- RAM: 4Gb DDR2 Memory 667Mhz
- Hard disk: 4 x Seagate ES SATAII HardDrive 7200RPM 250Gb (Total 500Gb)
- Raid 10: 3Ware Raid 9650SE: http://www.acnc.com/04_01_10.html
Scenario 2, SCSI:
- Server: IBM e326m 1U Rackmount server
- CPU: Double -- Opteron 275 is 2 x 2.2GHz, with 2 x 1MB L2 Cache
- RAM: 4Gb PC3200 ECC Registered
- Hard disk: 2 x 300GB SCSI 10K RPM
- Raid 1: LSI Logic
Would appreciate any tips. From these two, Scenario 1 looks marginally
better to me. I am requesting further information about cache and
battery powered backup, but would appreciate first-off thoughts based
on above info.
TIA!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2007-09-11 16:27:37 | Re: creating/dropping tables inside functions? |
Previous Message | Rodrigo De León | 2007-09-11 16:10:49 | Re: avg() of array values |