| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best |
| Date: | 2007-09-11 16:47:00 |
| Message-ID: | 46E6C684.9090006@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/07 11:26, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> Thanks Greg.
>
>
>> You're not going to get a particularly useful answer here without giving
>> some specifics about the two disk controllers you're comparing, how much
>> cache they have, and whether they include a battery backup.
>>
[snip]
>
>
> Would appreciate any tips. From these two, Scenario 1 looks marginally
> better to me. I am requesting further information about cache and
> battery powered backup, but would appreciate first-off thoughts based
> on above info.
How (on average) large are the records you need to insert, and how
evenly spread across the 24 hour day do the inserts occur?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG5saES9HxQb37XmcRAjZnAKCrPnIyuhuXm+InFpmn/bDiw/1xKgCg7xoC
pq4xdQ72BT4qFVqvy2g5RrM=
=EbRU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-09-11 16:54:38 | Re: Sthange things happen: SkyTools pgbouncer is NOT a balancer |
| Previous Message | Franz.Rasper | 2007-09-11 16:42:29 | Re: [SPAM] Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best |