Re: [SPAM] Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best

From: Franz(dot)Rasper(at)izb(dot)de
To: phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com, gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best
Date: 2007-09-11 16:42:29
Message-ID: 11EC9A592C31034C88965C87AF18C2A702B836A2@m0000s61
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>Scenario 1, SATAII:
>
>- Server: Asus RS120-E4/PA4 Dedicated Server
>- CPU: Single -- Intel Quad Core Xeon Processor x3210 Processor 2.13Ghz
>- RAM: 4Gb DDR2 Memory 667Mhz
>- Hard disk: 4 x Seagate ES SATAII HardDrive 7200RPM 250Gb (Total 500Gb)
>- Raid 10: 3Ware Raid 9650SE: http://www.acnc.com/04_01_10.html
>
>
>Scenario 2, SCSI:
>
>- Server: IBM e326m 1U Rackmount server
>- CPU: Double -- Opteron 275 is 2 x 2.2GHz, with 2 x 1MB L2 Cache
>- RAM: 4Gb PC3200 ECC Registered
>- Hard disk: 2 x 300GB SCSI 10K RPM
>- Raid 1: LSI Logic

Dont know anything about the LSI Logic controller, but
if it have battery backup write cache (at least 256 MB)
I would go with the IBM System. If am not wrong the harddisk
are hot swapable and you will get probably a better support.
Ask if you can get one for testing (normally IBM does it).

Some Questions:
Can you get Opterons with an higher cpu clock frequency ?
( >= 2.6 GHz)
Can you get 15K RPM SCSI disks ?

Greetings,

-Franz

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2007-09-11 16:47:00 Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2007-09-11 16:27:37 Re: creating/dropping tables inside functions?