From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best |
Date: | 2007-09-11 23:40:01 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10709111640n411dff03pe44e56b4cbb1f108@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 9/11/07, Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks Greg.
> Scenario 1, SATAII:
>
> - Server: Asus RS120-E4/PA4 Dedicated Server
> - CPU: Single -- Intel Quad Core Xeon Processor x3210 Processor 2.13Ghz
> - RAM: 4Gb DDR2 Memory 667Mhz
> - Hard disk: 4 x Seagate ES SATAII HardDrive 7200RPM 250Gb (Total 500Gb)
> - Raid 10: 3Ware Raid 9650SE: http://www.acnc.com/04_01_10.html
Good controller. Battery backed cache module?
> Scenario 2, SCSI:
>
> - Server: IBM e326m 1U Rackmount server
> - CPU: Double -- Opteron 275 is 2 x 2.2GHz, with 2 x 1MB L2 Cache
> - RAM: 4Gb PC3200 ECC Registered
> - Hard disk: 2 x 300GB SCSI 10K RPM
> - Raid 1: LSI Logic
LSI makes a lot of different RAID controllers.
Again, battery backed cache? and how much for each controller?
Generally LSI's have been a bit slower than escalades in the past, but
they're also quite stable and reliable, and their close in
performance.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Allison | 2007-09-12 00:01:15 | Re: Debian problem... |
Previous Message | Laimonas Simutis | 2007-09-11 22:55:33 | tsearch2 and parsing host strings |