Re: [patch] [doc] Minor variable related cleanup and rewording of plpgsql docs

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [patch] [doc] Minor variable related cleanup and rewording of plpgsql docs
Date: 2021-03-09 17:03:31
Message-ID: e1af006c-3269-260f-a08b-1fc50c86b221@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/30/20 10:37 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> po 30. 11. 2020 v 16:06 odesílatel David G. Johnston
>
> ok
This patch looks reasonable to me overall.

A few comments:

1) PL/SQL seems to be used in a few places where I believe PL/pgSQL is
meant. This was pre-existing but now seems like a good opportunity to
fix it, unless I am misunderstanding.

2) I think:

+ makes the command behave like <command>SELECT</command>, which is
described

flows a little better as:

+ makes the command behave like <command>SELECT</command>, as described

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-03-09 17:20:49 Re: WIP: document the hook system
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-03-09 16:42:53 Re: Re: [PATCH] regexp_positions ( string text, pattern text, flags text ) → setof int4range[]