Re: [patch] [doc] Minor variable related cleanup and rewording of plpgsql docs

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] [doc] Minor variable related cleanup and rewording of plpgsql docs
Date: 2021-03-09 17:44:46
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDkONUSdOzW0kAngqUrZ4Ai9iHEnG2-xg_dyLG25EzOqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

út 9. 3. 2021 v 18:03 odesílatel David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> napsal:

> On 11/30/20 10:37 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > po 30. 11. 2020 v 16:06 odesílatel David G. Johnston
> >
> > ok
> This patch looks reasonable to me overall.
>
> A few comments:
>
> 1) PL/SQL seems to be used in a few places where I believe PL/pgSQL is
> meant. This was pre-existing but now seems like a good opportunity to
> fix it, unless I am misunderstanding.
>

+1

> 2) I think:
>
> + makes the command behave like <command>SELECT</command>, which is
> described
>
> flows a little better as:
>
> + makes the command behave like <command>SELECT</command>, as described
>

I am not native speaker, so I am not able to evaluate it.

Regards

Pavel

> Regards,
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2021-03-09 17:48:58 Re: [PATCH] pg_permissions
Previous Message David Steele 2021-03-09 17:43:46 Re: Online verification of checksums