Re: [patch] [doc] Minor variable related cleanup and rewording of plpgsql docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [patch] [doc] Minor variable related cleanup and rewording of plpgsql docs
Date: 2021-03-09 18:08:10
Message-ID: 2036762.1615313290@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
> 1) PL/SQL seems to be used in a few places where I believe PL/pgSQL is
> meant. This was pre-existing but now seems like a good opportunity to
> fix it, unless I am misunderstanding.

PL/SQL is Oracle's function language, which PL/pgSQL is modeled on.
At least some of the mentions of PL/SQL are probably intentional,
so you'll have to look closely not just search-and-replace.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-03-09 18:12:06 Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-03-09 18:04:05 Re: default result formats setting