| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [patch] [doc] Minor variable related cleanup and rewording of plpgsql docs |
| Date: | 2021-03-10 00:28:47 |
| Message-ID: | 95edb49c-c675-f2e3-5833-214dabc955e5@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/9/21 1:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
>> 1) PL/SQL seems to be used in a few places where I believe PL/pgSQL is
>> meant. This was pre-existing but now seems like a good opportunity to
>> fix it, unless I am misunderstanding.
>
> PL/SQL is Oracle's function language, which PL/pgSQL is modeled on.
> At least some of the mentions of PL/SQL are probably intentional,
> so you'll have to look closely not just search-and-replace.
Ah, yes. That's what I get for just reading the patch and not looking at
the larger context.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ajin Cherian | 2021-03-10 00:58:57 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-03-09 23:48:43 | Re: partial heap only tuples |