From: | Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator |
Date: | 2009-07-15 21:22:49 |
Message-ID: | de22a6520907151422h525abc48qce68618592754aad@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Worked great, vacuumlo finished, a vacuum -full finished amazingly quickly,
very exciting. We're pointing qa apps at it now for testing.
For some reason though, that index has to be rebuilt after running
pg_migrator.
I'll be testing on our 100GB+ prod copy shortly and will let you know if you
want.
Thanks,
Jamie
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>wrote:
> Jamie Fox wrote:
>
> > Hi -
> > REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index;
> >
> > This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working
> again -
> > now to see how vacuumlo likes it.
>
> So did it work?
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-07-15 21:55:36 | Areca 1680 and RHEL/Centos 5.3 issue |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-07-15 20:24:25 | Re: savepoints in 8.3.7 or whatever... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fernando Ike de Oliveira | 2009-07-15 21:38:31 | Re: [PATCH] Psql List Languages |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-07-15 21:03:25 | Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07 |