Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
Date: 2009-07-15 16:28:57
Message-ID: 20090715162857.GJ4551@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Jamie Fox wrote:

> Hi -
> REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index;
>
> This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working again -
> now to see how vacuumlo likes it.

So did it work?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CG 2009-07-15 16:40:39 Automatic type conversion
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-15 16:23:08 Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-07-15 16:45:03 Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-07-15 16:27:54 Re: hot standby - merged up to CVS HEAD