From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on? |
Date: | 2020-06-03 12:05:44 |
Message-ID: | ddbe6fb4c95a8568259358190a54ad3aae097716.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 13:41 +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > I'm seeing the following at a customer site:
> >
> > SELECT confl_tablespace, confl_lock, confl_snapshot, confl_bufferpin, confl_deadlock
> > FROM pg_stat_database_conflicts
> > WHERE datname = 'something' \gx
> >
> > -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------
> > confl_tablespace | 0
> > confl_lock | 0
> > confl_snapshot | 84990
> > confl_bufferpin | 0
> > confl_deadlock | 0
> >
> > SHOW hot_standby_feedback;
> >
> > hot_standby_feedback
> > ----------------------
> > on
> > (1 row)
>
> One of the frequent causes is the lock acquired by (auto)vacuum when
> truncating the trailing empty blocks, maybe you can correlate your
> conflicts with autovacuum activity?
Yes, but that would show up as a lock conflict, not a snapshot conflict,
right?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-06-03 12:42:20 | Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on? |
Previous Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2020-06-03 11:55:25 | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |