Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on?

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on?
Date: 2020-06-03 12:42:20
Message-ID: CAOBaU_YimDw+5qYcXiMi4YkqxLDRo1X+4bRvZ2Ve6A+t_1m4Pg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:05 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 13:41 +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > I'm seeing the following at a customer site:
> > >
> > > SELECT confl_tablespace, confl_lock, confl_snapshot, confl_bufferpin, confl_deadlock
> > > FROM pg_stat_database_conflicts
> > > WHERE datname = 'something' \gx
> > >
> > > -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------
> > > confl_tablespace | 0
> > > confl_lock | 0
> > > confl_snapshot | 84990
> > > confl_bufferpin | 0
> > > confl_deadlock | 0
> > >
> > > SHOW hot_standby_feedback;
> > >
> > > hot_standby_feedback
> > > ----------------------
> > > on
> > > (1 row)
> >
> > One of the frequent causes is the lock acquired by (auto)vacuum when
> > truncating the trailing empty blocks, maybe you can correlate your
> > conflicts with autovacuum activity?
>
> Yes, but that would show up as a lock conflict, not a snapshot conflict,
> right?

Oh yes indeed, sorry for the noise.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2020-06-03 13:47:19 Re: Unable to find the details of bug fix in 9.6.x minor version.
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-06-03 12:05:44 Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on?