From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on? |
Date: | 2020-06-03 11:41:23 |
Message-ID: | CAOBaU_Y6ezV6BCMt7NFjPY-veDrX=MEkThza11T-CKGccyS8PQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:07 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> I'm seeing the following at a customer site:
>
> SELECT confl_tablespace, confl_lock, confl_snapshot, confl_bufferpin, confl_deadlock
> FROM pg_stat_database_conflicts
> WHERE datname = 'something' \gx
>
> -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------
> confl_tablespace | 0
> confl_lock | 0
> confl_snapshot | 84990
> confl_bufferpin | 0
> confl_deadlock | 0
>
> SHOW hot_standby_feedback;
>
> hot_standby_feedback
> ----------------------
> on
> (1 row)
>
> This is PostgreSQL 11.7, the standby didn't disconnect from the primary, and
> the number of replication conflicts is growing.
>
> I had thought that "hot_standby_feedback = on" would get rid of such
> conflicts.
>
> In the code I see a lot of call sites for ResolveRecoveryConflictWithSnapshot,
> so it is hard for me to track this down. Does anybody know what could cause
> these replication conflicts?
One of the frequent causes is the lock acquired by (auto)vacuum when
truncating the trailing empty blocks, maybe you can correlate your
conflicts with autovacuum activity?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2020-06-03 11:55:25 | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |
Previous Message | Paul Bonaud | 2020-06-03 11:11:12 | Re: Fine grained permissions on User Mapping |