From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backup command and functions can cause assertion failure and segmentation fault |
Date: | 2022-07-20 05:00:00 |
Message-ID: | c56647fa-4306-7170-17be-d91b627d22f0@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022/07/16 11:36, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I was thinking about doing that only on HEAD. One thing interesting
> about this patch is that it can also be used as a point of reference
> for other future things.
Ok, here are review comments:
+my $connstr =
+ $node->connstr('postgres') . " replication=database dbname=postgres";
Since the result of connstr() includes "dbname=postgres", you don't need to add "dbname=postgres" again.
+# The psql command should fail on pg_stop_backup().
Typo: s/pg_stop_backup/pg_stop_backup
I reported two trouble cases; they are the cases where BASE_BACKUP is canceled and terminated, respectively. But you added the test only for one of them. Is this intentional?
>> Since one of them failed to be applied to v14 or before cleanly, I
>> also created the patch for those back branches. So I attached three
>> patches.
>
> Fine by me.
I pushed these bugfix patches at first. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-07-20 05:08:36 | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-20 04:52:54 | Re: Remove fls(), use pg_bitutils.h facilities instead? |