From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |
Date: | 2020-11-09 20:33:16 |
Message-ID: | c3a43731-c981-420b-7bd4-ae54d6f8cfdb@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/9/20 12:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Nov-08, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
>> On 11/8/20 1:57 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>>> In case someone is interested: there is a little discussion going on on
>>> Reddit whether the new format of presenting functions in V13 is a step
>>> backwards:
>>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/jpi0rp/does_anyone_else_feel_like_the_v13_docs_are_a/
>>
>> Yeah, I would agree with the mobile first design comments. Then again that
>> plague is hitting most sites these days. My 2 cents is it is a step
>> backwards. You can cover more ground quickly and digest it faster in the old
>> format.
>
> The person who made that comment retracted later.
>
> If you have suggestion on how to improve the new format, I'm sure we can
> discuss that. It seems pretty clear to me that we're not going back to
> the old format.
Improve it by going back to old format. Not sure why that is not open to
discussion?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-09 20:35:20 | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-11-09 20:32:05 | Re: Foreign Data Wrapper Handler |