| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |
| Date: | 2020-11-09 20:06:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20201109200642.GA30521@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2020-Nov-08, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 11/8/20 1:57 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> > In case someone is interested: there is a little discussion going on on
> > Reddit whether the new format of presenting functions in V13 is a step
> > backwards:
> >
> > https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/jpi0rp/does_anyone_else_feel_like_the_v13_docs_are_a/
>
> Yeah, I would agree with the mobile first design comments. Then again that
> plague is hitting most sites these days. My 2 cents is it is a step
> backwards. You can cover more ground quickly and digest it faster in the old
> format.
The person who made that comment retracted later.
If you have suggestion on how to improve the new format, I'm sure we can
discuss that. It seems pretty clear to me that we're not going back to
the old format.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Coppens | 2020-11-09 20:10:53 | Execution plan does not use index |
| Previous Message | Tony Shelver | 2020-11-09 19:55:41 | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |