Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation

From: Tony Shelver <tshelver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation
Date: 2020-11-09 19:55:41
Message-ID: CAG0dhZA3iQA9FZeRQmVwZNTfB91YA9eHTEU1wZ+gSmxsxrhQAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 02:54, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 11/8/20 1:57 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> > In case someone is interested: there is a little discussion going on on
> > Reddit whether the new format of presenting functions in V13 is a step
> > backwards:
> >
> >
> >
> https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/jpi0rp/does_anyone_else_feel_like_the_v13_docs_are_a/
>
> Yeah, I would agree with the mobile first design comments. Then again
> that plague is hitting most sites these days. My 2 cents is it is a step
> backwards. You can cover more ground quickly and digest it faster in the
> old format.
>
> >
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
> Agreed, old format much more readable.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-11-09 20:06:42 Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation
Previous Message Sri Linux 2020-11-09 19:48:08 Re: After vacuum application runs very slow ? is this common behavior ?