Re: After vacuum application runs very slow ? is this common behavior ?

From: Sri Linux <srilinux09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: After vacuum application runs very slow ? is this common behavior ?
Date: 2020-11-09 19:48:08
Message-ID: CAFcfow-gHVcnYxFZFznFWr6EQbp+zoo0bgTwq4ont6jVxMtVZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thank you for your response.

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 11:14 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 11/6/20 8:20 PM, Sri Linux wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Our production database size is about 2TB and we had run into issues and
> > Postgres log did recommend running the vacuum in single-user mode. We
> > have successfully completed running a single user mode vacuum without
> > any options. .. services were online after vacuum. Application load time
> > and response times are very poor and don't load sometimes. Is this
> > common behavior after a vacuum? DO we need to consider any post
> > activities or give some time for the database to settle down?
>
> Given that there is no actual useful/hard data in the above the chances
> of there being a relevant answer in return is doubtful.
>
> Also given your subsequent post the major version you are using is
> nearing 1 year past EOL and is 21 minor releases behind the last release
> in the series. At the very least you need to bring it up to the last
> minor release.
>
> >
> > Did full os restart for the DB server?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sri.
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Shelver 2020-11-09 19:55:41 Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-11-09 17:45:43 Re: Temporary tables usage in functions