| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |
| Date: | 2020-11-09 20:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwa7jQuTC2Hi4Cbqzv3bno9O=2FDLjZSOhO8zGsoKjP6dA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:33 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 11/9/20 12:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > If you have suggestion on how to improve the new format, I'm sure we can
> > discuss that. It seems pretty clear to me that we're not going back to
> > the old format.
>
> Improve it by going back to old format. Not sure why that is not open to
> discussion?
>
More usefully, the current format and content changes are not going to be
"reverted" so "going back" is not really an option. If you want to propose
a patch for moving forward to a new format that is similar to the old one
while retaining the content changes that would be a possible way forward.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josef Šimánek | 2020-11-09 20:38:26 | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-09 20:35:20 | Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation |