From: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
Date: | 2006-01-16 20:44:25 |
Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0601161244p159f26feld9e9960f3b3a577d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 1/16/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I have added the following documentation addition to suggest this usage
> for constraint names.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --- 293,304 ----
> <term><literal>CONSTRAINT <replaceable class="PARAMETER">constraint_name</replaceable></literal></term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> ! An optional name for a column or table constraint. If the
> ! constraint is violated, the constraint name is present in error messages,
> ! so constraint names like <literal>"col must be positive"</> can be used
> ! to communicate helpful constraint information to client applications.
> ! (Double-quotes are required for constraint names that contain spaces.)
> ! If not specified, the system generates a name.
> </para>
> </listitem>
> </varlistentry>
>
>
a lot better... thanx...
what about lower the context part of the messages for plpgsql
functions? that seems debug info for me... just an idea ;)
pruebas=# select prueba();
ERROR: new row for relation "foo" violates check constraint "foo_fld_check"
CONTEXT: SQL statement "insert into foo values (-1)"
PL/pgSQL function "prueba" line 2 at SQL statement
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2006-01-16 20:45:37 | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 20:38:23 | Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-01-16 20:49:55 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-16 19:54:32 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |