From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
Date: | 2006-01-16 19:54:32 |
Message-ID: | 200601161954.k0GJsWh19910@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I have added the following documentation addition to suggest this usage
for constraint names.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 1/14/06, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Jaime Casanova wrote:
> > > From time to time people ask me if there is a way to "customize"
> > > messages for constraints so they could be more informative to the
> > > user...
> >
> > What about this?
> >
> > => create table foo (fld int4 constraint "fld must contain positive numbers" check (fld > 0));
> > CREATE TABLE
> > => insert into foo values (-5);
> > ERROR: new row for relation "foo" violates check constraint "fld must contain positive numbers"
> >
> > --
> > Peter Eisentraut
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
> >
>
> ok, i didn't know you can use such names...
>
> --
> regards,
> Jaime Casanova
> (DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-01-16 20:05:46 | Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 19:43:09 | Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-16 20:44:25 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-01-16 16:43:58 | Re: New pg_dump options: exclude tables/schemas, multiple all, wildcards |