From: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: message for constraint |
Date: | 2006-01-14 16:17:17 |
Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0601140817y69d1f2dap6a0bab0e2bf849b1@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 1/14/06, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
> > From time to time people ask me if there is a way to "customize"
> > messages for constraints so they could be more informative to the
> > user...
>
> What about this?
>
> => create table foo (fld int4 constraint "fld must contain positive numbers" check (fld > 0));
> CREATE TABLE
> => insert into foo values (-5);
> ERROR: new row for relation "foo" violates check constraint "fld must contain positive numbers"
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>
ok, i didn't know you can use such names...
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Denis Lussier | 2006-01-14 16:40:46 | Re: PG process architecture |
Previous Message | mark | 2006-01-14 16:06:07 | Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-01-14 16:30:41 | Re: pg_ctl crash fix |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-01-14 15:53:47 | Re: pg_ctl crash fix |