From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
Date: | 2006-01-16 20:49:55 |
Message-ID: | 20060116204955.GC32100@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> what about lower the context part of the messages for plpgsql
> functions? that seems debug info for me... just an idea ;)
>
> pruebas=# select prueba();
> ERROR: new row for relation "foo" violates check constraint "foo_fld_check"
> CONTEXT: SQL statement "insert into foo values (-1)"
> PL/pgSQL function "prueba" line 2 at SQL statement
It's not debug info in the sense of the DEBUG error levels. These are
meant as debug info of the server itself, like, say, a transaction
started. The CONTEXT line is exactly that, context information.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 20:52:01 | Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? |
Previous Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2006-01-16 20:45:37 | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-16 20:59:45 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-16 20:44:25 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |