| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me |
| Cc: | "pgsql-translators(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-translators(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: First Author? |
| Date: | 2021-05-31 19:02:07 |
| Message-ID: | c2a4fd93-ff7d-3aff-447b-98bb42bf0728@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-translators |
On 28.05.21 16:16, gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me wrote:
>> Personally, I am now leaning toward trimming the header comments to a
>> minimum. Authorship tracking etc. can be done via Git.
>
> Right, this sounds reasonable. However this is not currently the case,
> is it? For example, the commit that first introduced libpq's el.po, namely
> 6206454bda, does not contain any authorship information.
The commit message links to the translation repository, and the commit
there links to the redmine ticket.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-06-04 02:24:56 | Re: French translation typos |
| Previous Message | SAS | 2021-05-31 09:21:37 | Re: French translation typos |