Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date: 2017-05-04 21:47:54
Message-ID: c1250d7b-530f-cc37-1e59-74b7c54f2e2b@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/4/2017 2:28 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Thursday 04 May 2017 14:21:00 John R Pierce wrote:
>> or EBS, and I've heard from more than a few people that EBS can be
>> something of a sand trap.
>>
> Sorry for following up off-topic, but EBS has actually improved considerably
> in the last few years. You can get guaranteed (and very high) IOPS on SSD
> storage, and many instance types come with high-speed throughput to EBS. It's
> much much better for databases than it was 5 years ago.

has it become more stable when Amazon has their occasional major hiccups?

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2017-05-04 21:50:33 Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Previous Message Alan Hodgson 2017-05-04 21:28:32 Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?