| From: | Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)lists(dot)simkin(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |
| Date: | 2017-05-04 23:02:19 |
| Message-ID: | 3076895.99Qft1cd8t@skynet.simkin.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 04 May 2017 14:47:54 John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/4/2017 2:28 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 May 2017 14:21:00 John R Pierce wrote:
> >> or EBS, and I've heard from more than a few people that EBS can be
> >> something of a sand trap.
> >
> > Sorry for following up off-topic, but EBS has actually improved
> > considerably in the last few years. You can get guaranteed (and very
> > high) IOPS on SSD storage, and many instance types come with high-speed
> > throughput to EBS. It's much much better for databases than it was 5
> > years ago.
>
> has it become more stable when Amazon has their occasional major hiccups?
No ... when they have a major problem it generally cascades across the region,
and several outages have hit EBS in particular. In us-east-1, at least. Other
regions seem more reliable.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2017-05-04 23:30:46 | Link errors |
| Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2017-05-04 22:41:23 | Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |