Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)lists(dot)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date: 2017-05-04 21:28:32
Message-ID: 5844936.6QBLzj5KJP@skynet.simkin.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 04 May 2017 14:21:00 John R Pierce wrote:
> or EBS, and I've heard from more than a few people that EBS can be
> something of a sand trap.
>

Sorry for following up off-topic, but EBS has actually improved considerably
in the last few years. You can get guaranteed (and very high) IOPS on SSD
storage, and many instance types come with high-speed throughput to EBS. It's
much much better for databases than it was 5 years ago.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2017-05-04 21:47:54 Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-05-04 21:23:53 Re: Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?