Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j
Date: 2023-05-23 18:17:24
Message-ID: c05ff702-2573-ebb4-dfdd-66150ea2138b@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/23/23 12:19, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2023-05-22 21:10:48 -0500, Ron wrote:
>> On 5/22/23 18:42, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It looks like the assumption was that issuing link()
>>> requests in parallel wouldn't help much but just swamp your disk
>>> if they're all on the same filesystem.
>>> Maybe that could use rethinking, not sure.
>> It does need rethinking in the era of VMs and SANs. /var/lib/pgsql/15 is
>> going to be on a different LUN from /var/lib/pgsql/9.6
> You can't hardlink between different file systems.

We'd never hardlink.  Eliminates the ability to return to the old system if
something goes wrong.

--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Moench-Tegeder 2023-05-23 18:58:23 Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2023-05-23 17:19:29 Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j