Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j
Date: 2023-05-24 17:34:17
Message-ID: 20230524173417.yfj5v7nvdhmggxno@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2023-May-23, Ron wrote:

> We'd never hardlink.  Eliminates the ability to return to the old system if
> something goes wrong.

If you'd never hardlink, then you should run your test without the -k
option. Otherwise, the timings are meaningless.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La vida es para el que se aventura"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Horal 2023-05-24 20:28:21 Question regarding specifics of GIN and pg_trgm performance and potential use of show_trgm to improve it
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-05-24 14:09:58 Re: confused by int2vector typdelim