| From: | "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j |
| Date: | 2023-05-23 20:33:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20230523203305.o4oahw2zpyxs4nju@hjp.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2023-05-23 13:17:24 -0500, Ron wrote:
> On 5/23/23 12:19, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2023-05-22 21:10:48 -0500, Ron wrote:
> > > On 5/22/23 18:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > It looks like the assumption was that issuing link()
^^^^^^
> > > > requests in parallel wouldn't help much but just swamp your disk
> > > > if they're all on the same filesystem.
> > > > Maybe that could use rethinking, not sure.
> > > It does need rethinking in the era of VMs and SANs. /var/lib/pgsql/15 is
> > > going to be on a different LUN from /var/lib/pgsql/9.6
> > You can't hardlink between different file systems.
>
> We'd never hardlink.
But that was what Jeff and Tom were talking about. If you are changing
the subject you should at least make it explicit.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2023-05-23 22:08:00 | Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j |
| Previous Message | Christoph Moench-Tegeder | 2023-05-23 18:58:23 | Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j |