Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback
Date: 2018-08-23 04:43:09
Message-ID: bf851695-ca4e-ce0b-d226-bb165f18c545@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 2018/08/23 13:09, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2018, at 9:12 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Below is a copy of the press release draft:
>>
>> About the following:
>>
>> "PostgreSQL 11 also supports partitioned tables that utilize the
>> PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper,
>> [postgres_fdw](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html>),
>> enabling users to combine partitioning with data federation techniques."
>>
>> Just to clarify, we support partitioned tables containing partitions that
>> utilize FDWs even in PostgreSQL 10 [1]. Although, they were not handled
>> by tuple routing, so offered limited functionality as partitions.
>> PostgreSQL 11 fixed that limitation, which makes them more useful.
>
> Thanks for the clarification! Would something like “PostgreSQL 11 _provides better
> support for_…” work better?

Maybe, "PostgreSQL 11 enhances the foreign partition functionality offered
via its PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper [postgres_fdw] ..."?

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-23 16:56:23 Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-08-23 04:09:47 Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback