Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback
Date: 2018-08-23 17:26:32
Message-ID: C08D2ACD-F8A5-4E39-84CF-F1ECCD2D5A9D@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> On Aug 23, 2018, at 12:43 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> On 2018/08/23 13:09, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> On Aug 22, 2018, at 9:12 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>>> Below is a copy of the press release draft:
>>>
>>> About the following:
>>>
>>> "PostgreSQL 11 also supports partitioned tables that utilize the
>>> PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper,
>>> [postgres_fdw](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html>),
>>> enabling users to combine partitioning with data federation techniques."
>>>
>>> Just to clarify, we support partitioned tables containing partitions that
>>> utilize FDWs even in PostgreSQL 10 [1]. Although, they were not handled
>>> by tuple routing, so offered limited functionality as partitions.
>>> PostgreSQL 11 fixed that limitation, which makes them more useful.
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification! Would something like “PostgreSQL 11 _provides better
>> support for_…” work better?
>
> Maybe, "PostgreSQL 11 enhances the foreign partition functionality offered
> via its PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper [postgres_fdw] …"?

Thanks for the suggestion. I pushed some changes taking ideas from the
above.

Jonathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-08-23 17:27:56 Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-23 16:56:23 Re: PostgreSQL 11 Press Release Feedback